Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Todd Moore sets the record straight

Todd Moore wrote the below article in response to an editorial published in the Jonesboro Sun by Chris Wessel.

Father of WM3 murder victim certain who killed 3 boys
By Todd Moore
Guest Columnist

I am the father of West Memphis triple murder victim Michael Moore. I am writing this in response to your editorial in the June 6 edition of The Sun titled "Justice Unserved." It has always been my opinion that justice was served when Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jessie Misskelley were convicted in 1994 for the brutal murder of my son and his friends.

The three men who slaughtered my son were convicted by two juries that found them guilty in 1994. Despite this, the Arkansas Supreme Court generously granted the murderers the opportunity for a new evidentiary hearing to be held Dec, 5, 2011, to show evidence they claimed proved their innocence. They could have been granted a new trial to prove these claims of innocence. Instead of presenting their "new evidence" in open court last December, they opted to plead guilty to the murders in August 2011 in exchange for time served. 

Second District Prosecuting Attorney Scott Ellington agreed to accept the defense’s plea offer for vague reasons we still don't understand. Family members learned of the deal only at the last minute. The district attorney was new to the case. But whatever the rational, this continued to make the convicts guilty as a matter of law.

The defense team avoided sharing the results of the tests of everything with us by preemptively entering a guilty plea for their clients. Thanks to the plea deal, we may never know exactly what the defense found when the evidence was retested. Absence of DNA evidence does not prove the West Memphis Three (WM3) are innocent. The killers washed most of the evidence away in the water- filled ditch where they drowned my son. There was plenty of other evidence to convict them in 1994 without positive DNA. Most murderers are convicted without DNA evidence. 

The defense attorneys for the WM3 had nearly 20 years to find "the real killer" and failed to do so. After nearly two decades and untold millions in donated funds spent, the best they could do was find a hair that may or may not have belonged to Terry Hobbs, step- father of victim Stevie Branch. It was allegedly found on a shoelace used to tie my son. It has never been proven to actually belong to Terry Hobbs.
Even if it was Terry Hobbs' hair, that fact would prove nothing. Our sons were best friends, and my child spent considerable time in Terry Hobbs's home and could have picked up the hair on his shoe. This would be "secondary transfer" and makes the hair of no probative value. The defense has even admitted as much. Terry Hobbs did not murder my son. No credible law enforcement official believes so. Neither did Mark Byers, Mr. Bojangles nor any of the other defense red herrings. 

Contrary to your editorial, it is not up to police or the prosecutor to continue to look for "the real killer." The real killers were arrested and charged back in 1993, were found guilty in 1994 and then admitted their guilt in 2011 after getting a lucky break. To his credit, Prosecutor Ellington has stated many times that his door is open to any new leads and evidence presented to him by the WM3 defense teams. 

So far, nothing compelling enough to reopen the case has been presented to him. District Attorney Ellington stated as much the day your editorial appeared. This means despite the defense's grandiose claims prior to the pleas, not one iota of credible evidence has been presented to show their clients' innocence or even to view the convicted as anything less than what they are as a matter of law and as a matter-of fact: guilty. 

The WM3 defense team has been well-funded by numerous celebrities who were misinformed by the biased "Paradise Lost” documentaries. These one-sided films left out nearly all of the evidence that demonstrated the guilt of the WM3. They caused thousands of people to support the release of the convicted child killers with a very limited unndcrstanding of the actual facts of the case. 

Mr. Wessel, it appears that you, like so many others, got most of your misinformation about this case from these inaccurate documentaries. If you would take the time to dig a little deeper and actually read the case file documents, you would know that there was ample evidence to convict these three men for murdering my son. These documents are readily available on websites such as

Here are just a few examples of what was omitted from the documentaries:

• Jessie Misskelley confessed to the crime at least five times to police, prosecutors, even his own attorneys with his hand on a Bible. Misskelley confessed the first time after less than four hours of police questioning. That questioning was done with permission from his father. He continued to repeatedly confess in the year that followed.

• Damien Echols amassed a mental health record 500 pages long in the years immediately prior to the murders. In his own handwriting, he classified himself as a "homicidal, suicidal, schizophrenic, sociopath" just a months before he brutally murdered my son. 

• Read Damien Echols' current Twitter account to discover his deep-seated interest in skulls and the occult. There he also recently described artwork depicting a man sawing off his own arm as "breathtaking." In addition, Echols is obscenely profiting off the death of my son by selling his narcissistic books, promoting his self-serving movie, and tattooing murder groupies with his "mark." For two hundred dollars, you can have this sociopath tattoo an “X” on your arm. These Twitter posts and money-making schemes are a slap in the face to me, my family and my dead son.

• The movies omit the fact that these three men had no alibis. Damien Echols' and Jessie Misskelley's alibis completely fell apart on the stand in the 1994 trials. Jason Baldwin's attorneys didn’t even bother to present an alibi. 

• Fibers consistent with a robe in Jason Baldwin's home and a shirt in Damien Echols’ home were found on the victims. Blue candle wax found on Chris Byers' shirt was consistent with candle wax found in Damien Echols bedroom.

• The crime lab found that three different knots were used to hogtie the three victims with their own shoelaces. This points toward multiple killers rather than one killer. Witnesses say that Mr. Bojangles, the disoriented man near the crime scene that night, had a cast on one arm. No one person could have subdued and hogtied three energetic young boys--not Terry Hobbs and certainly not the one-armed Mr. Bojangles.

• A knife that could have been used in the murders was found in a lake behind Baldwin's home. It was a unique knife with a place hold a compass on the end that witnesses described as similar to one owned by Echols. 

• A car full of eyewitnesses placed Echols near the crime scene, covered with dirt, on the night of the murders. 

• Numerous friends, acquaintances and cell-mates came forward with tales of confessions from all three defendants. 

Throw out one or even several of those facts, and there would still be enough to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 

I sat through those trials. The basic facts need to be put out there. Otherwise, it makes a mockery of my son’s short life.

Todd Moore is the father of murder victim Michael Moore.
Published in the Opinion Section of the Jonesboro Sun on Tuesday, June 12, 2012 – Posted here by permission of Todd Moore


  1. I watched this documentary from my couch late one night 1995. Gave me chills. I always thought it was Mr T Hobbs he was emotionless and arrogant. To this day I believe he is guilty. His actions and activity from that night were odd. Cant learn much from tv but people reactions dont lie. I support Mr Moore and feel his pain and loss. Give him a break he is living in hell. My prayer and wishes are with him and his family.

    1. Odd? Did you just read the above article and can you say Damien's actions were "odd". There is so much evidence against the wm3. And one person could not have committed these crimes. Jessie had many times to say he was lying but he didn't and he knew too much detail for an innocent teenager. They are guilty!

  2. My heart breaks so much as I think of my three sons. My youngest turns 8 in August. I'm so tired of hearing about the injustice of the conventions. Echols in his buddies have zero sympathy from me. ECHOLS WAS BUSY GROMING HIS HAIR IN COURT AND SHOWED NOT ONE CONCERN ABOUT BEING ON TRIAL OR THE POOR LITTLE BOYS. HE ENJOINED THE ATTENTION, CONTINUES TO HAVE IT, THIS HAS BEEN THE BEST THING THAT COULD HAVE EVER HAPPENED TO HIM. WITHOUT IT HE WOULD HAVE REMAINED SIMPLE TRAILOR TRASH.

    1. Agree with you on the idea that Echols seems to have made off like a movie star. I'm not sure how accurate the movie was about his behavior (behind the scenes) but, there is definitely a narcissist arrogance he gives off, intentionally or not.

  3. I wish I could magically change what happen while still knowing what did happen and who did it and have the ability to enact that cruelty on them.

  4. Chris, Steven, and Micheal will always be in my heart.

  5. These trials were a joke. I'm upset as anybody that they're three little boys that are dead. But to convince somebody you actually have to show evidence. There was none there.

    1. DNA doesn't always convict people. They failed polygraphs and had no alibi. Jessie confessed many times and knew details. Water can wash away all DNA. The wm3 are guilty! I saw the documentaries and thought they were innocent because the documentaries leave out so much! Then I did my own research and saw so much of the evidence. Look at Damien's behavior while at court. He is smirking and giving the finger. Shows no remorse for the family.